Judge: Board Ruling Denying Veteran Benefits For Exposure To Agent Orange Stands

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on May 5 affirmed a ruling by the Board of Veterans Appeals that denied a man's claim for benefits from exposure to Agent Orange on grounds that the board's decision was "not clearly erroneous" (Larry Clemons v. David J. Shulkin, No. 15-4195, Vet. Clms.; 2017 U.S. App. Vet. Claims LEXIS 662). - See more at: https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/mealeys/b/newsheadlines/archive/2017/05/09/mealey-39-s-toxic-tort-environmental-judge-board-ruling-denying-veteran-benefits-for-exposure-to-agent-orange-stands.aspx?Redirected=true#sthash.9nSXzHIt.dpuf

READ THE REPORT

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on May 5 affirmed a ruling by the Board of Veterans Appeals that denied a man's claim for benefits from exposure to Agent Orange on grounds that the board's decision was "not clearly erroneous" (Larry Clemons v. David J. Shulkin, No. 15-4195, Vet. Clms.; 2017 U.S. App. Vet. Claims LEXIS 662).

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on May 5 affirmed a ruling by the Board of Veterans Appeals that denied a man's claim for benefits from exposure to Agent Orange on grounds that the board's decision was "not clearly erroneous" (Larry Clemons v. David J. Shulkin, No. 15-4195, Vet. Clms.; 2017 U.S. App. Vet. Claims LEXIS 662). - See more at: https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/mealeys/b/newsheadlines/archive/2017/05/09/mealey-39-s-toxic-tort-environmental-judge-board-ruling-denying-veteran-benefits-for-exposure-to-agent-orange-stands.aspx?Redirected=true#sthash.9nSXzHIt.dpuf