WASHINGTON,
D.C. - A judge in U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on March 29
reversed and remanded a case brought by a man who contends that he was injured
as a result of exposure to Agent Orange during his service in the U.S. Army.
The judge said the Board of Veterans Affairs provided "inadequate"
reasons for denying the veteran's claim (Harold L. Burt v. Robert A. McDonald,
No. 15-0853, U.S. App., Vet. Clms.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 454).
WASHINGTON,
D.C. - A judge in U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on March 29
reversed and remanded a case brought by a man who contends that he was
injured as a result of exposure to Agent Orange during his service in
the U.S. Army. The judge said the Board of Veterans Affairs provided
"inadequate" reasons for denying the veteran's claim (Harold L. Burt v.
Robert A. McDonald, No. 15-0853, U.S. App., Vet. Clms.; 2016 U.S. App.
LEXIS 454).
- See more at:
https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/mealeys/b/newsheadlines/archive/2016/04/01/mealey-39-s-toxic-tort-environmental-judge-reverses-remands-agent-orange-case-reasons-for-denial-were-39-inadequate-39.aspx?Redirected=true#sthash.suDe1xKy.dpuf
WASHINGTON,
D.C. - A judge in U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims on March 29
reversed and remanded a case brought by a man who contends that he was
injured as a result of exposure to Agent Orange during his service in
the U.S. Army. The judge said the Board of Veterans Affairs provided
"inadequate" reasons for denying the veteran's claim (Harold L. Burt v.
Robert A. McDonald, No. 15-0853, U.S. App., Vet. Clms.; 2016 U.S. App.
LEXIS 454).
- See more at:
https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/mealeys/b/newsheadlines/archive/2016/04/01/mealey-39-s-toxic-tort-environmental-judge-reverses-remands-agent-orange-case-reasons-for-denial-were-39-inadequate-39.aspx?Redirected=true#sthash.suDe1xKy.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment