Updated research aims to help Vietnam-era veterans who served in Guam ill from Agent Orange exposure obtain disability benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Last year, two veterans groups published a white paper
citing research to support that "as likely as not," veterans who
served on Guam from 1962 to 1975 met the legal standard for exposure to Agent
Orange and other "dioxin-containing herbicides." Now, the groups --
National Veterans Legal Services Program and Veterans Legal Services Clinic at
Yale Law -- have released updated research expanding that timeline to include
veterans who served on Guam from 1958 to 1980.
"The conclusion was based on an exhaustive review
conducted over nearly two years of government, private, archival, and oral
history evidence of herbicide use in Guam during the Vietnam era," the
groups said in a news release about the research. The February update includes
new developments and information on herbicide use in Guam gathered after the
original paper was published in May 2020, including "an EPA-directed soil
sampling report published in July 2020 and recently issued decisions of the
Board of Veterans’ Appeals."
Veterans Affairs has approved 22,500 – 34% – of all Blue
Water Navy claims filed after 14 months
Tens of thousands of American troops served on Guam during
the Vietnam War and, at the height of bombing operations during the conflict,
more than three-quarters of all U.S. B-52 aircraft available for operations
were based in Guam. The rapid buildup of U.S. airpower in Guam, along with
climate conditions on the island, housing and water shortages and other
challenges, prompted military leaders to work to prevent fires and control
tropical growth using the herbicides.
“This white paper confirms the reports of countless veterans
who served in Guam but whose claims the VA has wrongly rejected,” Bart
Stichman, executive director of NVLSP, said at the time of the initial report's
release. “It is time that the VA acknowledge the strong evidence of toxic
herbicide exposure in Guam and care for veterans exposed.”
No comments:
Post a Comment