http://www.prlog.org/12374222-the-blue-water-vets-are-injured-angry-and-not-taking-anymore.html
Sep. 22, 2014 - Members of the Blue Water Navy are caught
in a failure of logic. According to the rules of logic, either the
concept of “presumptive exposure” needs to be consistently applied or it
must be abandoned. But it cannot be contradictory, randomly interpreted
or selectively assigned.
‘Presumptive Exposure’ is
based on the concept that a lack of data precludes any one individual
from providing definitive proof of exposure to a substance (in this
case, herbicide used in Vietnam). If individual A is a member of a group
that was potentially exposed, and that individual later presents with
specific disease deemed to be related to herbicide exposure, then
individual A is ‘presumed to have been exposed’ by virtue of two
elements: proximity to the exposure area and diagnosis of a specific
disease.
The original area of acknowledged exposure, as
written into the VA’s 1991 M-21 Manual, was the Theater of Combat, as
demonstrated by the award of the Vietnam Service Medal. By definition,
the Theater of Combat was the identical area designated for eligibility
for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. Attached are: an image of the
boundaries of the Theater of Combat AND the identical area of
eligibility for the Vietnam Service Medal; and the history of
eligibility for presumption of exposure to herbicide as written in the
M-21 Manual, showing changes from 1991 through 2002.
In
2002, the VA changed the definition of a Vietnam veteran to “someone
who actually served on land in the Republic of South Vietnam (RVN).” For
the purposed of herbicide exposure, that eliminated previously eligible
veterans whose feet did not touch the soil of South Vietnam, or a dock
or a pier that can be considered an extension of the land.
READ MORE
No comments:
Post a Comment